Comment and Opinion

This site earned an Encouragement Award in the 2004 Millenium Awards.

Sylvia Browne

Could this be referring to Sylvia?

See more of Cectic here.

This woman steals money from people by pretending to be a psychic. She claims to be able to see the future and to be able to talk to the dead. When she was asked by James Randi for some evidence of these claims she blathered. (And she has been avoiding the issue for days.) The worst part, however, was when she was asked why she had not foreseen the tragedy at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Here is the pathetic rubbish she posted on her web site:

Sylvia has been given the following information regarding the attack:

• Osama bin Laden and another group is behind the attack;
• Be aware of "Triad of Jordan" and "Palestinian Republic of Bundi";
• A weapon or bomb known as the "Z" was involved with the aircraft;
• Two names to watch for (phonetic spelling) - Mohammed Karema and Zehar Mentusi.

Sylvia did not get advance warning because she is not omniscient. Her list of predictions in 1999 warned of terrorism, but clearly the timing was wrong. Please pray for the wellbeing of the victims and their families, and focus your anger on helping other people rather than seeking revenge.

Sylvia - suppository or saint? (29/11/2003)
Someone was not pleased with what I had to say about charlatan Sylvia Browne, and sent me the following message.

Translated into something compatible with the characteristics of the human eye, it said:

Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:26:27 -0500 (EST)
Subject: sylvia browne

its people like you that diminsh good faith in the world and the people that bring it. Lucky for sylvia, she pays no attention...get over youre ego guy

I know Sylvia pays no attention. If she did she would either do what she says she can do and collect James Randi's million dollars or she would shut up and stop lying.

On December 26, 2004, an earthquake off the western end of Indonesia caused a tsunami wave which damaged coastal towns in many countries around the Indian Ocean and killed more than 150,000 people. I wondered if the world's great psychics had predicted this, so I wrote to Sylvia Browne:

To: office@sylvia.org
Subject: Tsunami
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 11:01:08 +1100

Hello,

I realise that Sylvia doesn't usually read emails, but I am sure that she has been asking the office staff to print this one out for her as soon as it arrives.

I have been looking all over Sylvia's web site for a warning about the earthquake and subsequent tsunami which caused so much death and destruction in the countries bordering the Indian Ocean yesterday. As it is the holiday season I know that web site updates may not be a high priority (my site, The Millenium Project, is usually updated on either Saturday or Sunday, but the schedule is a real mess for this week and next), but a notice about a disaster like this could have been put up on the site before everyone went home for Christmas.

There is, of course, the distasteful possibility that Sylvia only warned people who paid $750 for her time to do so, but as the majority of the people in the affected areas could not afford this I am sure that it is not the case.

On a brighter note, if such a term can be used in such tragic circumstances, I am sure that Sylvia will offer her services to pass on messages from the victims to their friends and relatives. I have no doubt that the Red Cross would welcome her assistance and perhaps even provide her with transport (most residents of the disaster area cannot afford to ring the US, even when the phones are working), but I have heard that Psychiques Sans Frontieres is assembling a disaster relief team and she may prefer to work through that organisation.

I received no answer, but the following appeared on her web site:

In October 2004 on the Montel Williams Show, Sylvia advised viewers to avoid travel to India due to safety concerns. On December 26th Sylvia's prediction was validated when a tsunami devastated India. Sylvia further warns that travel to the region will not be safe for another 6 months due to health issues (water purity, disease) created in the aftermath of the tsunami.

Anyone who has seen or read the news will know that only a psychic clutching at straws would say that the tsunami "devastated India". It affected a very small part of the southern tip of the country, but had no effect on the main tourist destinations or the commercial, agricultural or manufacturing areas. Saying that the tsunami devastated India is equivalent to saying that the most recent hurricanes to do damage in Florida devastated the USA. I would be much more impressed if Sylvia could point to a prediction advising people not to go to Banda Aceh. Surely the death toll there would have made a bigger ripple in whatever forces in the universe she uses to predict the future.

What is it about Sylvia fans and weird emails.

From: "Kelly Mays"
Subject: U R AN...........
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:38:13 -0500

IDIOT!!!!! IF, IF..... SHE WERE 100% CORRECT ON EVERYTHING, SHE WOULDN'T BE "HUMAN"!!   SHE'D BE SOME PROFIT OR ANGEL  FROM HEAVEN "WARNING US,"       AND SHE'D BE RIGHT ON TARGET. FOR GOD'S SAKE!! GET OVER IT!!!!!! I THINK YOU AND RANDI DEAR SHOULD "GO CLIMB A FREAKIN' TREE!!" THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF BOOKS OUT NOW THAT "PROVE" THAT THERE IS INDEED LIFE                                  AFTER DEATH!!!!                            AND IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE? THAN HELL, I FEEL SORRY FOR YOU AND STUPID RANDI. I REALLY DO. VERY SINCERELY, KELLY S. SIZEMORE Ps. U R CORRECT ABOUT ONE THING..... SHE DOES CHARGE TOO DAMN MUCH. I DON'T KNOW WHERE THE HELL THE MONEY IS GOING? AND WHY SHE AMONG OTHERS CHARGE SO DAMN MUCH FOR SOMEONE'S GRIEF, OR ETC; BUT IT'S HER SOUL.......NOT YOURS AND NOT MINE. BUT.....I DO INDEED BELIEVE HER; NOT ON EVERYTHING, BUT ON A LOT OF THINGS. PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD NEED HEALING, NEED LOVE,   NEED ATTENTION.   BUT PAYING $750.00 IS OUT RANGIEST TO SAY THE LEAST.       xxxxxxxxxx@msn.com

But wait, there's more!

From: "Kelly Mays"
Subject: How Did U Get This??
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 01:09:24 -0500

I replied:

1. I got it by you addressing an email to me using a link on the bottom of a page.

2. It is not a board, it is a web site.

3. I will publish anything that comes to me if I feel like doing so.

4. If I were to be critical of someone's grammar it would not be for the correct use of the subjunctive mood.

A haggish fraud lawyers up (10/2/2007)
Or should that be "A fraudulent hag lawyers up?". One of the worlds most blatant non-psychics, Sylvia Browne™, has decided that she doesn't like criticism of her and her work and has threatened legal action against a web site called StopSylviaBrowne.com. In the true spirit of people who either can't or won't respond to criticism by presenting facts, Sylvia Browne™ has not sued for defamation but has claimed that the site owner is damaging the trademark "Sylvia Browne". This strategy can be used to initiate and maintain a lengthy and expensive court case where lawyers argue about the finer points of commercial and intellectual property law while avoiding any discussion of freedom of speech until the respondent either goes broke or gives up. I have had some experience with this. (I should point out that my use of the term "intellectual property" should in no way be taken to imply that there is anything about Sylvia Browne™ that is in any way related to the every-day use of the word "intellectual".)

Here are some facts. Sylvia Browne™ has no power to see the future or to detect anything by any form of supernatural or paranormal power. She is a stage performer who pretends to be really doing things that many other stage performers will admit are tricks of the trade. She could be seen as a harmless buffoon if she didn't charge very large sums of money to deceive and disappoint people who are influenced by the credibility given to her by uncritical television programs. The most recent in a long series of Sylvia Browne™ gaffes was to tell the parents of a missing boy that their son was dead and then offer to locate his body (for a suitable fee, of course). The boy was alive and has been returned to his parents, but has The Trademark apologised? Of course not. I have children of my own and I can imagine what these parents went through not knowing what had happened to their son. I can equally imagine how they must feel now that they know that they were lied to and had their hopes almost destroyed by a charlatan who only saw them as an unopened pay packet.

On a lighter note, I was intrigued by the logo used by The Trademark's law firm (who managed to misspell their client's name at one point, a sure sign of competence in a business where cases can be decided on ambiguities in punctuation). It looks very much as if the logo includes a representation of a goose. (Note to lawyers - the logo is reproduced here for the purpose of fair comment and any suggestions that its appearance here dilutes or damages its commercial value will be met with incredulity and several more entries in the Google index for the words "idiotic" and "risible".)

Under the headword "goose" in my copy of the Macquarie Dictionary it gives as one of the definitions "a silly or foolish person; simpleton". The word can also be used as a verb, and here the dictionary says "to poke someone between the buttocks". Perhaps this could be taken as a suggestion for what Sylvia Browne™ and her lawyers should do with their ridiculous law suit.